Waiting to do a massive energy retrofit project more effective than an incremental approach

Printer-friendly versionSend by email

According to Passive House thought leaders, a large-scale retrofit can improve CO2 levels by 80 percent over incremental changes

July 09, 2014

When you assess the long-term impact of different levels of energy-efficiency in buildings across a 50-year span, taking an incremental approach to renovations is actually a poor strategy, according to a Passive House thought leader. A better approach is to wait several years until a proper Passive House–level building shell can be implemented. The difference between doing a Passive House renovation over standard, incremental improvements is an 80 percent difference in CO2 levels over 50 years.

Read more

Comments on: "Waiting to do a massive energy retrofit project more effective than an incremental approach"

August 2016

This Month in Professional Builder

Products
Features

Builders and architects say the best way to persuade them to try a new product is by showing how it performs.

Overlay Init