To rent or to buy? That’s the question many prospective buyers and renters face, and the answer usually comes down to finances. The answer today is simple: renting is cheaper than buying in nearly every state. With short housing supply and increasing home prices, renters have found relief in lowered rents in urban areas, sweetening the decision even further, says the New York Times. A new LendingTree survey found median housing costs were lower for renters in every large U.S. metro. The differences were most dramatic in costly cities such as New York, San Francisco, and San Jose.
A recent study by LendingTree found that median housing costs were lower for renters than for homeowners with a mortgage in all 50 of the largest U.S. metro areas. The greatest difference between the median rent and the median cost of owning a home with a mortgage was in New York City, at $1,363 a month. San Francisco and San Jose, Calif., were next, with the gap between renting and owning exceeding $1,000.
To reach its conclusions, LendingTree compared median rents and mortgaged housing costs using data from the Census Bureau. This week’s chart shows the 10 metro areas with the largest and the smallest differences in housing costs for renters and owners.
Advertisement
Related Stories
Housing Markets
Which US Housing Markets Are the Hottest?
Denver once again tops the list of the hottest MSAs overall on the U.S. News Housing Market Index, exhibiting a mix of strengths including a positive ratio of building permits to job growth
Affordability
The 5 Most and 5 Least Affordable US Housing Markets
The top five least affordable major markets are all in California, while Lansing, Mich., leads the pack of affordable metros
Housing Markets
Metros Seeing the Biggest Jumps in Home Inventory
While inventory levels are still down compared with historical data, it's reassuring to see recent inventory increases indicating a more positive trend