| Kent Conine, President NAHB Kent@conine.com
|
In sending the listing back to a lower court for review, the court also questioned a proposed critical habitat designation for the owl. That designation included land-use restrictions that could add $12,000 to the price of a new home in Tucson.
The NAHB, the Southern Arizona HBA and the HBA of Central Arizona successfully argued that the FWS failed to consider the number of pygmy owls in Mexico, where the bird is plentiful. The court also agreed that the FWS failed to present evidence that the Arizona pygmy owl is genetically different from populations in Mexico.
The FWS too often lists species first and tries to justify its decisions later. We need environmental protection based on solid scientific evidence.
Advertisement
Related Stories
Land Planning
Helena Habitat for Humanity Aims to Build 1,000 Affordable Homes
A new Habitat for Humanity project in Helena, Mont., aims to deliver 1,000 affordable housing units and outdoor community amenities
Government + Policy
How Eminent Domain May Be Used to Respond to Climate Crises
Eminent domain, which grants the government power to take private property for public use, has displaced thousands of Americans for the sake of infrastructure in the past, but it may be used for a better purpose in a global climate crisis
Q+A
Soil Connect Is Moving Dirt and Building Relationships
Cliff Fetner created Soil Connect so builders and developers could more easily move dirt and other aggregates from jobsite to jobsite, but it has expanded to become something much more
