Currently Reading

Alternative Deck Footing Product, Diamond Pier, Releases 10-year Study Examining Frost Heave Performance

Decking + Railings

Alternative Deck Footing Product, Diamond Pier, Releases 10-year Study Examining Frost Heave Performance

Manufacturer of the Diamond Pier, Pin Foundations, Inc. recently released a 10-year frost study finding the Diamond Pier resisted frost heave 99.7% of the time.

By Diamond Pier December 3, 2020
View of the outside deck.

For deck builders in the Northern parts of the US, frost heave is the ultimate variable. It’s the unpredictable force of nature that garners the most call backs for builders come wintertime.

When the Diamond Pier Foundation System appeared on shelves over 10 years ago, there was hesitancy with new users about the system - in fear that it would not hold up to frost heave pressures. Additionally, since there is no ASTM testing methodology for foundation systems in freezing conditions, so the building code industry relies upon observational evidence as the basis for deriving a reasonable standard of performance for a given frost zone depth.

To satisfy skeptical builders, Pin Foundations, Inc. provided a longer history of observational data in order to prove the Diamond Pier’s efficiency in resisting frost heave.

PFI conducted a 10-year-study collecting warranty data, visiting warranty sites, and using the USDA Web Soil Survey to assess soil data around warranty claim sites, which included Minnesota extending into western Wisconsin, eastern North and South Dakota, northern Iowa, and Omaha, Nebraska.

Diamond Piers installation process.

The study included all warranty claims in the designated area from 2009 to 2019. 95,000 installed footings, or just over 14,200 projects were included in the study data.

Over a 10-year period, Pin Foundations, Inc. had been notified of unacceptable movement due to frost in 70 of the 14,200 projects, which represents 0.00493% of the projects installed. This represents ½ of 1% (0.005).

The sites were investigated and were found to have severe frost heave susceptible soils, according to the USDA Web Soil Survey, and did not meet specific PFI conditions and uses guidelines found in the Diamond Pier Installation Manual (PFI, 2018; see first paragraph under “Supporting Soils,” page 5).

Even on the troubled sites, most piers were unaffected, with:

  • 102 requiring intervention
  • 63 adjusted
  • 39 replace

The Diamond Piers that required replacement represent about 1/20 of 1% (0.00041) of Diamond Pier footings installed.

The incident rate is far lower than might be expected based on frost susceptibility soil conditions parameters as well as many environmental cycles, and represents statistical evidence of wholly acceptable Diamond Pier performance in frost zone soils.

The study provides evidence that the Diamond Pier successfully resisted frost heave 99.7% of the time. Furthermore, the study examined the locations of the 0.3% of footings that heaved, and found they were installed in soil conditions that did not meet the minimum soil requirements stated in the Diamond Pier Installation Manual. Meaning there were zero product failures due to frost in areas that met the soil requirements defined in the Installation Manual.

Diamond Piers project installed

Pin Foundations, Inc. feels this study should satisfy the concerns of those who are looking for empirical evidence of the product’s performance in areas with frost heave susceptible soils. They feel this study represents valid empirical evidence of equivalent or better performance
when compared to anecdotal performance of traditional concrete footing.

Contact Info:

Pin Foundations, Inc.
Contact Person: Ronnie Marlin
(708) 406-5005
[email protected]

Diamond Piers logo

Related Stories

Construction Quality

7 Deadly Sins: Avoid These Construction Defects, Part I

Home builder best practices for identifying and eliminating construction defects in roofing, siding, and decks


A Preview of New Products From 2020 IBS? Absolutely!

If you're curious about what new products will be at the 2020 International Builders' Show, here's a sampling ...


Do Wood Alternatives to Pressure Treated Lumber Really Deliver?

Alternatives are emerging to challenge chemically treated lumber, but are they viable in application?


More in Category


Create an account

By creating an account, you agree to Pro Builder's terms of service and privacy policy.

Daily Feed Newsletter

Get Pro Builder in your inbox

Each day, Pro Builder's editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.

Save the stories you care about

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

The bookmark icon allows you to save any story to your account to read it later
Tap it once to save, and tap it again to unsave

It looks like you’re using an ad-blocker!

Pro Builder is an advertisting supported site and we noticed you have ad-blocking enabled in your browser. There are two ways you can keep reading:

Disable your ad-blocker
Disable now
Subscribe to Pro Builder
Already a member? Sign in
Become a Member

Subscribe to Pro Builder for unlimited access

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.