flexiblefullpage - default
Currently Reading

Green Building Programs More About Bias than Science, Expert Argues

Advertisement
billboard - default

Green Building Programs More About Bias than Science, Expert Argues

James L. Bowyer, a professor at the University of Minnesota, is challenging the science – or lack of it – behind many widely used green building programs.


By By Susan Bady, Senior Editor, Design January 31, 2008
This article first appeared in the PB February 2008 issue of Pro Builder.

 

Jim Bowyer believes the lack of life-cycle assessment in many green building programs could defeat the purpose of building green in the first place.

Arguing that personal bias has more to do with green-building standards than science, a University of Minnesota professor is challenging LEED, the NAHB green building standard and other widely used programs. James L. Bowyer, emeritus professor of bioproducts and biosystems engineering, contends that in many cases, the prescriptive standards of those programs are leading people away from green rather than toward it.

One of Bowyer's criticisms is that only one of the major programs he's studied, Green Globes, calls for systematic analysis of the environmental impact of materials during their entire life cycles. "I think it's really time for the major programs to move toward adoption of life-cycle assessment/life-cycle inventory, especially when it comes to identifying environmentally preferable construction materials," says Bowyer.

Although adopting LCA won't be easy, without such analysis, seeking to maximize the number of credits could lead to an increase — rather than a decrease — in environmental effects associated with construction.

The U.S. Green Building Council has announced it wants to incorporate LCA throughout its LEED programs, but Bowyer notes, "The USGBC has a history of implementing change at glacial speed." And NAHB isn't faring any better at incorporating LCA into its green building program. "It simply says you can use LCA if you want to, and you get a point for doing it," he says. "But there's no real provision that LCA be used. The way the standard's written, it's kind of unlikely that anybody is even going to do that."

Responding to Bowyer's comments about LEED, Eric Corey Freed, LEED AP and principal of organicArchitect in San Francisco, says, "The good news is that LEED is wonderfully democratic. The bad news is that, like most democracies, it is achingly slow to adopt change."

Freed thinks that as LEED continues to evolve, the standards will become more stringent. But to be successfully incorporated into LEED, an LCA standard would have to be "strong, widely adoptable and easy to understand — not to mention objective, independent and free from possible greenwashing by manufacturers."

He notes that two such LCA standards are becoming available. One is the Smart Consensus Sustainable Product Standard, developed by the Institute for Market Transformation to Sustainability. The other is the Pharos Lens, a "beautifully simple" LCA labeling standard from the Healthy Building Network.

Related Stories

Sustainability

Here Are the Most Sustainable U.S. Cities in 2022

These metros are working to reduce their carbon footprints by blazing a trail toward eco-friendly living and green building 

Sustainability

The Future of Residential Construction Is Not on Land, but in (or Very Near) the Sea!

Builders are rising to meet the challenge, as homeowners pursue more resort options

Resilient Construction

The Wrongs of Make It Right in New Orleans' Affordable Housing

The legacy of the Make It Right Foundation's failed efforts to restore and revive underserved neighborhoods in New Orleans' Lower Ninth Ward goes well beyond leaky roofs and toxic mold

Advertisement
boombox1 -
Advertisement
native1 - default
halfpage2 -

More in Category




Advertisement
native2 - default
Advertisement
halfpage1 -

Create an account

By creating an account, you agree to Pro Builder's terms of service and privacy policy.


Daily Feed Newsletter

Get Pro Builder in your inbox

Each day, Pro Builder's editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.

Save the stories you care about

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

The bookmark icon allows you to save any story to your account to read it later
Tap it once to save, and tap it again to unsave

It looks like you’re using an ad-blocker!

Pro Builder is an advertisting supported site and we noticed you have ad-blocking enabled in your browser. There are two ways you can keep reading:

Disable your ad-blocker
Disable now
Subscribe to Pro Builder
Subscribe
Already a member? Sign in
Become a Member

Subscribe to Pro Builder for unlimited access

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.