As federal dollars supporting resiliency efforts and programs are threatened, shrunk, repealed, or expired, including the annual tracking of billion-dollar weather events by a federal agency, a series of pragmatic guidelines from HUD, and tax incentives to boost the performance of new and existing homes, the onus falls on the housing industry to take the matter of resiliency into its own hands.
A jaded journalist bent on provocation might suggest that natural disasters that wipe out whole neighborhoods and more are actually good for the housing industry, an opportunity for builders and developers to cash in and keep busy with rebuilding efforts. Certainly, predatory practices are nothing new in those situations.
But that’s not me. As professionally cynical and loose-tongued as some might accuse me of being, I can’t go there.
I’d much rather see home builders take the lead in building better, above-code homes to strict, verified standards that measurably reduce the impacts of climate-driven disasters and enable people to resume their lives more quickly, perhaps even the next day.
This isn’t Pollyanna talk. It’s happening. At Babcock Ranch in southwest Florida (pictured above), at Dixon Trail in Escondido, Calif., at Veridian at County Farm in Ann Arbor, Mich., at The Atlantic Club on the shores of Long Branch, New Jersey, on roofs in Louisiana and Alabama and Maine, and even in post-Maria Puerto Rico, among others across the country.
By design and collaboration. By will and long-term commitment. By your peers.