flexiblefullpage - default
Currently Reading

Housing Policy Update: Federal rule makers ignore small business advocacy panel

Housing Policy Update: Federal rule makers ignore small business advocacy panel

Flawed, unnecessary, and costly regulations burden small home builders by raising expenses and slowing the home building process. These hurdles ultimately rob builders of time and money and pass on higher housing costs to consumer.


By National Association of Home Builders May 24, 2013
This article first appeared in the PB May 2013 issue of Pro Builder.

Flawed, unnecessary, and costly regulations burden small home builders by raising expenses and slowing the home building process. These hurdles ultimately rob builders of time and money and pass on higher housing costs to consumers, NAHB told Congress recently. 

The problem is so severe that a 2011 NAHB study found, on average, regulations imposed by governments at all levels account for 25 percent of the final price of a new single-family home. Nearly two-thirds of this regulatory burden is imposed during the land development process and increases the final price of the house by 16.4 percent. About one-third of unnecessary regulations affect construction costs after the builder purchases the finished lot and adds 8.6 percent to a new home’s price tag.
 
Lawmakers received an earful recently when NAHB had the opportunity to talk about the impact of regulations on small home builders at a recent hearing by the House Small Business Committee’s Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight, and Regulations. Testifying on behalf of NAHB, Carl Harris, co-founder of Carl Harris Co., Inc., based in Wichita, Kan., told Congress that federal agencies must stop ignoring the input from small businesses when making rules that directly affect their livelihood and the way they do business. Federal agencies are circumventing the intent and the letter of a law that is meant to make the regulatory process more cost effective and less burdensome for small businesses, he said. As a result, the regulatory process continues to unnecessarily increase compliance costs and is acting as a drag on the housing and economic recovery.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

Harris was referring to agency compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which requires agencies to convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel to evaluate a regulation’s potential impact on small businesses before finalizing the rule-making process. Harris described the process as seriously flawed.
 
“Far too often, federal agencies either view compliance with the act as little more than a procedural ‘check-the-box’ exercise, or they artfully avoid compliance by other means,” he said. “Agencies should seek to partner with small entities to help create more efficient, more effective regulations and, in so doing, reduce the compliance costs for small businesses. We truly are the experts in the field.”
 
For example, in 2008 OSHA proposed the Cranes and Derricks Rule intended to protect workers from the hazards associated with hoisting equipment during construction. The RFA required OSHA to convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel to evaluate the rule’s potential impact on small businesses. However, OSHA did not establish a panel until after the rule-making process was completed. Harris, who participated on that review panel, explained to OSHA officials that the rule does not take into account the differences between crane applications for residential construction sites and for large commercial construction sites.
 
“I personally put forward an effective, feasible alternative that would save lives while keeping the cost of compliance low for small businesses,” he said.
 
However, since small businesses were not brought into the process until after the rule was finalized, Harris said his comments “fell on deaf ears. It seemed little more than a procedural hurdle with little interest from OSHA to make changes based on the feedback received.”
 
In his testimony, Harris provided numerous other examples such as storm water regulations, lead paint abatement rules, OSHA reporting requirements on work-related musculoskeletal disorders, critical habitat designations, and other instances where a smarter and more sensible regulatory process would benefit the housing industry, home builders, and small businesses as well as consumers.
 
“The pattern is often the same: Agencies either fail to comply with the [RFA] by ignoring the statutory obligation to convene a small entity review panel, or convene a panel but fail to provide the panelists sufficient information concerning the proposed rule to allow them to evaluate regulatory options or provide alternatives,” Harris added.
 
“Unfortunately, all too often federal agencies view compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act as either a technicality of the federal rule-making process or, worse yet, as unnecessary,” Harris said. “I urge Congress to seek ways to improve agency compliance with this law.”

Related Stories

Financing

Mortgage Application Activity Drops to Lowest Level in Over Two Decades

As housing costs continue to surge and prospective buyers back out of home purchases, fears of a recession are mounting, and mortgage application activity is falling as a result

Economics

Has Inflation Already Peaked? July CPI Report Reveals Stagnant Growth

After plateauing in July following consistent gains throughout much of 2022, the most recent Consumer Price Index has some experts wondering if the worst of an inflation storm is already behind us

Economics

Robert Shiller Predicted the Housing Bubble and Bust of 2008. Here’s His Take on the 2022 Market

Economists warn of trouble on the horizon as home prices begin to fall, but some firms refuse to get bearish on market conditions—here's why

Advertisement
boombox1 -
Advertisement
native1 - default

More in Category




Advertisement
native2 - default
Advertisement
halfpage1 -

Create an account

By creating an account, you agree to Pro Builder's terms of service and privacy policy.


Daily Feed Newsletter

Get Pro Builder in your inbox

Each day, Pro Builder's editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.

Save the stories you care about

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

The bookmark icon allows you to save any story to your account to read it later
Tap it once to save, and tap it again to unsave

It looks like you’re using an ad-blocker!

Pro Builder is an advertisting supported site and we noticed you have ad-blocking enabled in your browser. There are two ways you can keep reading:

Disable your ad-blocker
Disable now
Subscribe to Pro Builder
Subscribe
Already a member? Sign in
Become a Member

Subscribe to Pro Builder for unlimited access

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.