Currently Reading

The Framer Who Went Modular: Q+A With Nathan Young of ModsPDX

Advertisement

The Framer Who Went Modular: Q+A With Nathan Young of ModsPDX

By rethinking his approach to legacy building methods, Nathan Young is achieving greater efficiencies and lower production costs


By Rich Binsacca, Editor-in-Chief August 22, 2019
ModsPDX CEO Nathan Young
This article first appeared in the September 2019 issue of Pro Builder.

Nathan Young sits in the middle of his 60,000-square-foot warehouse in north Portland, Ore., wearing a thick, hooded sweatshirt with the words “Game Changer” across the front. An old-school site-builder and framer by training, he’s been leading (and growing) ModsPDX, an off-site home construction/modular business, since the Great Recession caused him to rethink his approach to legacy building methods.

To be sure, ModsPDX is not a high-tech facility run by robots or similar automation, but it doesn’t need to be. In fact, combining detail-oriented, building-science–based stick framing with a manufacturing mindset and a controlled construction environment is all Young needs to achieve greater efficiencies and lower production costs than his on-site competitors

It might not be as sexy as some off-site advocates portray, but Young’s measured approach may well be the poster child for changes in housing construction.

 

Q  What got you started in factory-built housing?

A The market crash [of 2008] took us from 12 guys to just me and a significant amount of overhead I was still paying for. I started looking into modular and found it wasn’t much different from stick building, just more controlled. When we moved our framing operations indoors, the principles were to better understand the science of building and how to put our products together more efficiently to build a higher-quality product.

 

Q  How does ModsPDX achieve efficiencies?

A  In any kind of building construction, every house is essentially a combination of boxes; it’s just how you put those boxes together [that varies]. If we can standardize the [dimensions of the] box—what I call a universal building platform—I know, for instance, that every one of my floor joists is the same length, and I can “mass produce” them quickly. 

We also save a lot of time because, being inside, we can just unplug and leave our tools and hoses where they are at the end of the day and pick them up [to start working] the next morning. On a jobsite, you might spent 45 minutes setting up at the start of the day and another 45 minutes rolling up at the end of the day. That time isn’t lost in here.

 

Q  What other benefits have you realized?

A  Our tolerances here are extremely tight. That floor [points to a nearby module] is 78 feet end-to-end and has a 1/8-inch variance over that length. We also don’t have any moisture in our buildings; the wettest our lumber ever gets is when it’s delivered. We’re also always building on the floor of the warehouse; each module for a four-story townhouse or apartment building is on the floor versus up in the air when you’re outside, which is a safer and faster way to build.

 

Q  How has your approach to building changed?

 Our brains have changed from being very linear in how we build to having more of a manufacturing mindset, such as where and how to stage materials and modules or panels for receiving and shipping. We went from focusing on speed, like an on-site framer, to efficiency, like a manufacturer, and looking at the whole system versus just the framing.

 

Q  What role does automation play in your operation?

A  We’ve looked a lot at automation, but there’s a high capital cost. By the time we would have programmed the machine to know everything we need it to do, I’d have a house framed. It’s really an issue of scale and downtime. You need a steady volume to continually feed that machine, and the minute you don’t have enough, your ship is going to sink.

 

Q  Is this a model for the future of modular housing?

 For smaller builders, I think something like this is fairly attainable. Basically, we work in a 60,000-square-foot warehouse with overhead cranes and a Gradall forklift and about $50,000 in table saws, shop saws, and nail guns. It [doesn’t cost] multimillion dollars to get into it. 

 

 

Related Stories

Planning + Development

Thomas Beadel on Splitting Lots, Doubling Inventory

The business model for Thomas James Homes' Trademark by TJH brand brings more opportunities for buyers in neighborhoods where inventory is tight

Affordability

Andrés Duany on New Urbanism’s Legacy and Affordable Housing

As a leading advocate for smart growth, Miami-based architect and urban planner Andrés Duany's vision for housing development and affordability is both bold and practical

Modular Homes

Ken Semler on Franchising's Role in Helping Modular Building Grow

Can a national franchise be the solution to what is holding back single-family residential construction from modular building?

Advertisement

More in Category




Advertisement

Create an account

By creating an account, you agree to Pro Builder's terms of service and privacy policy.


Daily Feed Newsletter

Get Pro Builder in your inbox

Each day, Pro Builder's editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.

Save the stories you care about

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

The bookmark icon allows you to save any story to your account to read it later
Tap it once to save, and tap it again to unsave

It looks like you’re using an ad-blocker!

Pro Builder is an advertisting supported site and we noticed you have ad-blocking enabled in your browser. There are two ways you can keep reading:

Disable your ad-blocker
Disable now
Subscribe to Pro Builder
Subscribe
Already a member? Sign in
Become a Member

Subscribe to Pro Builder for unlimited access

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.