The study was sponsored by The Home Depot, the FSC and the AF&PA, the primary association of the wood products industry. As a consensus study focused on comparison, it did not point to one program as superior or make recommendations, but the results show the considerable differences between the independent, third-party FSC system and its industry-sponsored competitor.
SFI regulations are less stringent on clear cutting, preservation of old-growth and endangered species, water quality and conservation of biological diversity. The SFI also lacks a consistent chain-of-custody system identifying lumber and other wood products as havingbeen harvested from a certified forest.
The Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group that has worked with at least two major builders, Pulte and KB Home, in developing environmentally responsible wood procurement and use habits, contends that although the SFI continues to improve, "the underlying conclusions of the study justify the continuing preferences of companies for FSC."
The study can be downloaded at Meridian’s Web site, www.merid.org
Advertisement
Related Stories
Building Materials
Building Materials Prices Saw Increases in February
Prices for gypsum, ready-mix concrete, and steel-mill products all rose during February, according to Producer Price Index data, while softwood lumber prices declined
Innovation
University of Michigan Researchers Unveil Sustainable 3D Printing Material
Researchers from the Digital Architecture Research & Technology Laboratory at Michigan State University have developed an eco-friendly 3D printing material made from sawdust
Building Materials
Construction Materials Prices Stabilize as Supply Chains Improve
Construction input prices have posted no upward movement in five months, a relief for home builders facing increased demand for new construction