The study was sponsored by The Home Depot, the FSC and the AF&PA, the primary association of the wood products industry. As a consensus study focused on comparison, it did not point to one program as superior or make recommendations, but the results show the considerable differences between the independent, third-party FSC system and its industry-sponsored competitor.
SFI regulations are less stringent on clear cutting, preservation of old-growth and endangered species, water quality and conservation of biological diversity. The SFI also lacks a consistent chain-of-custody system identifying lumber and other wood products as havingbeen harvested from a certified forest.
The Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group that has worked with at least two major builders, Pulte and KB Home, in developing environmentally responsible wood procurement and use habits, contends that although the SFI continues to improve, "the underlying conclusions of the study justify the continuing preferences of companies for FSC."
The study can be downloaded at Meridian’s Web site, www.merid.org
Advertisement
Related Stories
Awards
6th Annual Most Valuable Product Awards
Drumroll ... Please join us in celebrating our 6th Annual MVP Awards winners, which represent the best in innovative building products
Sustainability
Fortera Takes Concrete Steps to Reduce the Climate Impact of Cement
Clean-tech company Fortera, which uses technology to capture carbon emissions form cement manufacturing, will open its first commercial-scale operation on April 12, 2024, in California
Building Materials
Lumber Leads Building Materials Prices Higher in March
Overall, the cost of building materials rose during March, with softwood lumber, gypsum products, and concrete all seeing price increases. Only steel mill materials saw price drops