This month, we feature two markets that are on the rebound from housing downturns, Denver and Honolulu. Denver is one of our favorite markets in the country. In addition to being situated in the center of the country, the area boasts a high education level and an outstanding quality of life. The long-term outlook for continued economic prosperity in Denver is excellent. For a market with plenty of land in the outlying areas, housing is also relatively expensive. The median price of a resale home is $241,900, but prices vary widely by location. For $240,000, a consumer can buy a new townhome near the city or a 2,000-square-foot new detached home on a 6,000-square-foot lot 30 minutes north of the city. Denver has a history of brutal housing cycles, which in the past have been driven by a combination of high supply and economic downturns in single industries (oil and technology). Today, the market is slowly improving after the technology decline of the early 2000s. Prices are slowly on the rise and job growth has returned. The local pricing environment in Denver remains competitive, primarily because so many large builders are trying to maintain high sales volumes. The highly competitive conditions of the local housing market will persist and constrain price gains for the short-term. With an abundant land inventory, high levels of supply will continue to be added in outlying areas, even though these areas were hit the hardest during the recent downturn. Building in desirable locations and within a reasonable commuting distance to central Denver are the lowest-risk strategies, as evidenced by the relatively strong performance of the Highlands Ranch and Stapleton communities during the local downturn. Over the long-term, a presence in Denver will pay off. After being battered by the California and Japanese recessions in the 1990s, and the decline in tourism caused by 9/11 and SARS, Honolulu is on the rebound. The housing market feels like it did in the late 1980s, with bidding wars all over the island and high-rise residential construction again starting in Honolulu. With a median price of about $451,000, Honolulu housing is far from cheap. D.R. Horton, Centex and Brookfield have all successfully expanded to Hawaii in the last several years, but each is taking high risks by competing with local builders who have owned their land for decades. In the last two years, the housing markets in Oahu, Maui and the Big Island have all experienced robust price appreciation. Long-time home owners are recovering their equity and moving up to a new home, while the California-buyer-driven resort market is exploding. One of the most amazing examples of resort demand is Centex's Kolea community on the Big Island, with townhome prices exceeding $1,000 per square foot! Although we are certain to get nasty e-mails for printing this, the new home architecture in Hawaii today reminds us of the cheap housing of the 1980s. Finally, local builder Stanford Carr Development and some of the mainland builders are beginning to "raise the bar" architecturally. With only 4,100 permits issued on Oahu, in 2004 and another 3,400 on Maui and the Big Island combined, Hawaii is too small for most of the large builders but the right size for someone with local connections who is happy building a few hundred homes per year.
Hawaii State Historical Permit Activity
Oahu
Maui
Big Island
Single Family
Multi Family
Total
Single Family
Multi Family
Total
Single Family
Multi Family
Total
1983
1,568
1,284
2,852
547
24
571
880
96
976
1984
2,199
1,056
3,255
640
4
644
900
181
1,081
1985
2,314
1,993
4,307
946
407
1,353
927
213
1,140
1986
2,021
2,094
4,115
943
474
1,417
1,089
159
1,248
1987
2,670
899
3,569
1124
570
1,694
960
86
1,046
1988
1,945
1,341
3,286
1608
918
2,526
1,495
258
1,753
1989
1,582
1,876
3,458
1175
962
2,137
2,562
487
3,049
1990
1,524
1,453
2,977
1128
748
1,876
2,025
644
2,669
1991
1,203
2,915
4,118
700
993
1,693
2,309
609
2,918
1992
1,793
2,795
4,588
816
178
994
1,501
121
1,622
1993
1,916
1,495
3,411
661
210
871
1,540
184
1,724
1994
2,440
2,172
4,612
528
342
870
1,052
123
1,175
1995
2,090
2,454
4,544
475
114
589
1,003
88
1,091
1996
1,125
875
2,000
544
210
754
726
77
803
1997
1,141
894
2,035
532
67
599
649
69
718
1998
1,272
329
1,601
574
67
641
759
53
812
1999
1,449
479
1,928
647
247
894
1,004
94
1,098
2000
1,732
237
1,969
904
239
1,143
1,356
147
1,503
2001
1,673
302
1,975
778
277
1,055
1,249
138
1,387
2002
1,964
709
2,673
787
397
1,184
1,303
138
1,441
2003
2,910
563
3,473
877
211
1,088
1,941
239
2,180
2004
2,580
1,602
4,182
974
161
1,135
1,751
520
2,271
Average
1,869
1,355
3,224
814
355
1,169
1,317
215
1,532
Source: John Burns Real Estate Consulting calculations of Census Bureau data
Home