Responding to the recent Oxford University and University of Hong Kong's study published in The Lancet, CityLab's Feargus O'Sullivan states there may be a strong public health case to be made for densifying the suburbs based on the results.
The health benefits of walkable neighborhoods are examined in the study's evaluation of populations and communities in the United Kingdom. The study concludes obesity rates are higher in suburban, and sparse living areas, while cities and dense housing clusters spark more physical activity and greater social support opportunities. Findings do suggest that the suburbs are not attracting people more likely to be obese than others.
While it would be mistaken to assume that observations made in the U.K. could apply everywhere, they make one thing clear: Residents’ health is highly likely to improve when sprawling suburbs are made more dense. As the graph below details, it also breaks ground by matching obesity levels with specific rates of housing density.
Advertisement
Related Stories
Market Data + Trends
Vacation and Investment Home Market Insights
A recent report finds beach homes to be the most sought-after vacation-home type and that the investment potential of a second home is an important factor in the purchasing decision
Affordability
How Much Income Do First-Time Buyers Need to Afford the Average Home?
The median-priced home is unaffordable in 44 of the 50 largest U.S. metro areas
Affordability
What Is the Relationship Between Urban vs. Suburban Development and Affordability?
A new paper from Harvard's Joint Center looks at whether expanding the supply of suburban housing could, in turn, help make dense urban areas more affordable
