Housing costs for renters and owners in urban areas are the most expensive, compared to suburban and rural markets.
At the national level, renter households in urban areas that are earning the median income can expect to pay 36.8 percent toward housing. In the suburbs, these households have to pay 31.8 percent, and in rural areas, 23.9 percent, the only segment where households would not be cost-burdened, writes Zillow economist Sarah Mikhitarian. For those looking to own, buying the median-priced home in an urban core would require 26.5 of their income for the monthly mortgage payment, whereas in rural and suburban areas, the share is between 13.4 and 20.2 percent, respectively.
The nation’s worsening housing affordability challenge is, perhaps not surprisingly, largely centered in the country’s urban centers, where housing costs are high and incomes are more disparate. But those seeking respite in the nation’s stalwart, sprawling suburbs may be surprised to find little relief there, either. Instead, it’s the country’s rural heartland that tends to offer the best housing bargains.
Advertisement
Related Stories
Affordability
How Much Income Do First-Time Buyers Need to Afford the Average Home?
The median-priced home is unaffordable in 44 of the 50 largest U.S. metro areas
Affordability
What Is the Relationship Between Urban vs. Suburban Development and Affordability?
A new paper from Harvard's Joint Center looks at whether expanding the supply of suburban housing could, in turn, help make dense urban areas more affordable
Market Data + Trends
10 States Where Home Insurance Rates Have Risen the Most
Responding to the increasing number of natural disasters, insurers are hiking prices, with some states bearing the brunt more than others