After analyzing data from the Census Bureau, economist Jed Kolko found that density is not always the opposite of sprawl.
Kolko defines sprawl as areas with fewer households per acre and that are also car-dependent. But residents of Portland, with fewer households per acre than Las Vegas, are more likely to take public transit, walk, or bike to work than residents of Las Vegas. The same goes for the people of Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Chicago – all are less dense than Los Angeles, but their citizens prefer public transit.
This insight can help planners and builders understand the popular preference for population density among American households. Speaking of the spacious Western states, where a nighttime satellite image shows swaths of near-empty land from Dallas to Fargo and St. Louis to San Francisco, Kolko writes: “In an America where people often insist their cities are too “full” to accommodate growth, this is where you would want to build more.”
But he’s quick to add that “that’s not quite the right way to look at the question. Most of us aren’t aiming to maximize the amount of land we own. We want some space, but space within commuting distance of jobs, stores and schools.”
Advertisement
Related Stories
Affordability
What Is the Relationship Between Urban vs. Suburban Development and Affordability?
A new paper from Harvard's Joint Center looks at whether expanding the supply of suburban housing could, in turn, help make dense urban areas more affordable
Market Data + Trends
10 States Where Home Insurance Rates Have Risen the Most
Responding to the increasing number of natural disasters, insurers are hiking prices, with some states bearing the brunt more than others
New-Home Sales
Mortgage Rates Are Up but New-Home Sales Still Solid in March
Lack of existing home inventory drove a rise in new-home sales, despite higher interest rates in March